was Ibn Arabi?
was a prominent Sufi; in fact he was an extreme Sufi. His name was Muhammad ibn ‘Ali ibn Muhammad al-Taa’i al-Andalusi.
The scholars have told us about him in response to a question which was put to them. The question was as follows:
do the imaams of the religion and the guides of the Muslims say about a book which has been circulating among the people,
the author of which claims that he wrote it and distributed it to people by permission of the Prophet Muhammad (peace and
blessings of Allaah be upon him) which was given to him in a dream which he claims to have seen? Most of this book contradicts
what Allaah revealed in His Books and is opposed to what His Prophets said.
the things that he says in this book are: Adam was called insaan because in relation to the truth (Al-Haqq),
he was like the pupil [insaan] of the eye, the part that can see.
he said: Al-Haqq which is transcendent is the physical creation which you can see.
the people of Nooh he said: if they had turned away from their worship of [their idols] Wudd, Siwaa’, Yaghooth and Ya’ooq,
they would have lost more of Al-Haqq.
he said: Every object of worship is a manifestation of Al-Haqq. Those who know it, know it, and those who do not know
it, do not know it. The one who has knowledge knows what he is worshipping and in what image the object of his worship is
manifested. These many and varied manifestations are like the limbs of a physical image.
he said concerning the people of Hood: They reached a true state of closeness (to Allaah) and were no longer remote. The heat
of Hell no longer affected them and they gained the blessing of closeness to Allaah because they deserved it. They were not
given this delicious experience as a favour, but because they deserved it as a result of the essence of their deeds, for they
were on a straight path.
he denied the idea of the warning against those of mankind against whom the word of punishment is justified.
the one who believes in what he says be denounced as a kaafir, or should we accept what he says, or what? If the person who
listens to him is an adult of sound mind, and does not denounce him by speaking or in his heart, is he a sinner, or what?
explain to us clearly and with proof, as Allaah has taken the covenant from the scholars on that basis, for negligence [on
the part of the scholars] causes a great deal of confusion to the ignorant. (‘Aqeedah Ibn ‘Arabi wa Hayaatuhu by Taqiy al-Deen al-Faasi, p. 15, 16).
(The author) mentioned the response of some of the scholars:
Badr al-Deen ibn Jamaa’ah said:
passages quoted, and other similar parts of this book, are bid’ah and misguidance, evil and ignorance. The religiously-committed
Muslim would not pay any heed to them or bother to read the book to find out more.
he said: The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon
him) could never give permission in a dream for something which goes against and contradicts Islam; on the contrary, this
is from the evil insinuations or whispers of the Shaytaan and a trap whereby the Shaytaan is playing with him and tempting
words about Adam, that he is the pupil of the eye, and his likening Allaah to His creation, and his remark that ‘Al-Haqq
which is transcendent is the physical creation which you can see’ – if by ‘Al-Haqq’ he is referring
to the Lord of the Worlds – is a clear statement of anthropomorphism [likening Allaah to His creation] and he has taken
this notion to extremes.
regard to his denial of what has been narrated in the Qur’aan and Sunnah concerning the warning: this makes him a kaafir
in the view of the scholars of the followers of Tawheed.
comments about the people of Nooh and of Hood is vain and false talk which deserves to be rejected. The best way of dealing
with that is to destroy this and all other similar passages of his book, for it is no more than fancy words, an expression
of baseless ideas and an attempt to introduce into the religion ideas that do not belong to it. The ruling on this is that
it should be rejected and ignored. (Ibid., p. 29, 30).
Khateeb al-Qal’ah Shaykh Shams al-Deen Muhammad ibn Yoosuf al-Jazari al-Shaafa’i said:
be to Allaah. His comment about Adam being called insaan is anthropomorphism [likening Allaah to His creation] and
is a lie and falsehood. His belief that the idol-worship of the people of Nooh was valid is kufr. Anyone who says such a thing
cannot be approved of. His comment that ‘Al-Haqq which is transcendent is the physical creation which you can
see’ is false and contradictory, and it is also kufr. His comment that the people of Hood had reached a true state of
closeness (to Allaah) is a lie against Allaah, and by saying this, he has rejected what Allaah said about them. His remark
that they were no longer remote and that Hell became a blessing and a joy for them is a lie and a rejection of everything
that was revealed to the Prophets; the truth of the matter is what Allaah said about that, that they (the people of Hood)
will abide in the torment forever.
those who believe what he says – and he knows what he said – the same ruling applies to them as to him: that they
are misguided kaafirs, if they have knowledge. If they do not have knowledge, then the person who says that out of ignorance
should be told the truth and taught about it, and should be stopped if possible.
denial of the warning to all people is a lie and a rejection of the consensus (ijmaa’) of the Muslims. No doubt Allaah
will bring about the punishment. Islam offers definitive evidence that a group of sinners from among the believers will be
punished, and the one who denies that is regarded as a kaafir. May Allaah protect us from wrong belief and denying the Resurrection.
(Ibid., p. 31, 32).
Ibn Taymiyah said:
Muslims, Christians and Jews all know something which is a basic principle of the Muslims’ religion: that whoever says
of any human being that he is a part of God is a kaafir, he is regarded as a disbeliever by all these religions. Even the
Christians do not say this, although their belief is a major form of kufr; no one says that the essence of creation is part
of the Creator, or that the Creator is the creation, or that Al-Haqq which is transcendent is the physical creation
which you can see.
his remark that if the Mushrikeen turn away from idol-worship, they will have turned away from Al-Haqq to the extent
that they have abandoned idol-worship, is obviously kufr according to the basic principle that is common to all the religions.
For the religions are agreed that all the Prophets forbade idol-worship and regarded as disbelievers those who did that; the
believer cannot be a believer unless he disavows himself of worshipping idols and of everything that is worshipped instead
of Allaah. As Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning);
“Indeed there has been an excellent example for you in Ibraaheem (Abraham) and those with him, when they said
to their people: ‘Verily, we are free from you and whatever you worship besides Allaah, we have rejected you, and there
has started between us and you, hostility and hatred for ever until you believe in Allaah Alone’” [al-Mumtahanah
and he quoted other aayaat as proof -- then he said:
says that if the idol-worshippers give up their idols, they will have turned away from Al-Haqq to the extent that they
have abandoned idol-worship, is an even worse kaafir than the Jews and Christians, and the one who does not regard them as
kaafirs is an even worse kaafir than the Jews and Christians, for the Jews and Christians regard idol-worshippers as disbelievers,
so how about one who says that the one who gives up idol-worship has turned away from Al-Haqq to the extent that he
has abandoned idol-worship?! Let alone the fact that he says, The one who has knowledge knows what he is worshipping
and in what image the object of his worship is manifested. These many and varied forms are like the limbs of a physical image
and the energy in a spiritual image; nothing but Allaah is being worshipped in everything that is worshipped. He is an even
greater kaafir than the worshippers of idols, for they only take them as intercessors and mediators, as Allaah says (interpretation
of the meaning): “ [The Mushrikeen say]
‘We worship them only that they may bring us near to Allaah’” [al-Zumar 39:3]
they taken (others) as intercessors besides Allaah? Say: “Even if they have power over nothing whatever and have no
intelligence?” [al-Zumar 39:43]
acknowledged that Allaah is the Creator of the heavens and the earth, and the Creator of the idols, as Allaah says (interpretation
of the meaning):
if you ask them: ‘Who created the heavens and the earth?’ Surely, they will say: ‘Allaah (has created them)’”
[al-Zumar 39:38] (Ibid., 21-23)
al-Islam also said:
the faqeeh Abu Muhammad ibn ‘Abd al-Salaam came to Cairo and they asked him about Ibn ‘Arabi, he said:
is a vile and evil shaykh who says that the world is eternal and does not see anything haraam in any sexual relationship.
mentioned the belief that the world is eternal because this is what [Ibn ‘Arabi] believed, but this is well-known form
of kufr and the faqeeh Abu Muhammad denounced him as a kaafir because of this. At that time Ibn ‘Arabi had not yet said
that the universe was God or the universe was the image and essence of God. This is a greater form of kufr because those who
say that the universe is eternal still believe that there had to be Someone Who brought it into existence, that from the One
Who must exist comes that which may exist. Those shaykhs who met him [Ibn ‘Arabi] said that he was a liar and a fabricator,
and that in his books such as al-Futoohaat al-Makkiyyah etc. there were lies which could not be concealed from any
have not even mentioned one-tenth of what they mentioned about kufr, but people who do not know about them have been deceived
by these ideas, just as they were deceived by the Baatini Qaraamitah when they claimed to be descendents of Faatimah and said
that they belonged to the Shee’ah, so the Shee’ah began to like them without knowing of their hidden kufr. So
the person who is attracted to them is one of two things: either he is a heretic and hypocrite, or he is misguided and ignorant.
With regard to these pantheists (ittihaadiyoon), their leaders are the leaders of kufr and must be executed, and their repentance
cannot be accepted if they are seized before they repent, for they are among the greatest heretics, those who make an outward
display of being Muslim whilst concealing kufr in their hearts, those who conceal their beliefs and their opposition to Islam.
Everyone who follows them, who defends them, who praises them, who admires their books, who is known to help them, who does
not like to speak against them or who makes excuses for them by saying that we do not know exactly what these statements mean,
who says ‘How can we be sure that he wrote this book?’ and other excuses which no one but an ignorant person or
a hypocrite would come up with, must be punished.
it is obligatory to punish everyone who knows about them but does not help to resist them, because campaigning against these
people is one of the most serious duties, for they have corrupted the minds and religious belief of many shaykhs, scholars,
kings and princes, and they are spreading corruption throughout the world, preventing people from following the path of Allaah.
The harm that they cause to the religion is greater than that done by those who damage the worldly interests of the Muslims
but leave their religion alone, such as bandits on the highways and the Tatars (Mongols) who took their wealth but left their
religion alone. Those who do not know them should not underestimate the danger they pose. Their own misguidance and the extent
to which they misguide others defies description.
thinks well of them and claims not to know how they really are should be informed about them. If he does not then turn his
back on them and denounce them, then he should be classed as one of them.
says that their words could be interpreted in such a way that it does not contradict sharee’ah is one of their leaders
and imaams. If he is intelligent, he should know what they really are. But if he believes in it and behaves like this openly
and in secret, then he is a worse kaafir than the Christians. (Ibid.,
p. 25-28 – adapted and abbreviated)